Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-04-06 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2018-04-06 House Journal Page 3078 HB 355 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 5 calendar (page 3042), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 355(JUD) "An Act relating to the crime of criminally negligent burning; relating to protection of and fire management on forested land; relating to prohibited acts and penalties for prohibited acts on forested land; requiring the Alaska Supreme Court to establish a bail schedule; and providing for an effective date." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 355(JUD) be returned to second reading for amendments. There was objection. The question being: "Shall CSHB 355(JUD) be returned to second reading for amendments?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 355(JUD) Third Reading Return to Second for Amendments YEAS: 16 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Parish, Seaton, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Millett, Rauscher Absent: Foster, Neuman, Spohnholz, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico And so, the motion failed. The question being: "Shall CSHB 355(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2018-04-06 House Journal Page 3079 CSHB 355(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 28 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Knopp, Neuman, Reinbold, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Millett, Rauscher And so, CSHB 355(JUD) passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Chenault gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 355(JUD).